As the premier provider of mobile, on-demand storage units, SMARTBOX brings a convenient and non-traditional approach to portable storage. Whether you are looking for additional space to store extra belongings or planning a long distance or local move, SMARTBOX offers moving and storage solutions that are easy to use, secure and completed with professional quality each and every time. The SMARTBOX concept redefines portable storage because of its innovative design and functionality. Each unit is designed to make loading and unloading easy, while at the same time offering optimum coverage and protection for stored contents. SMARTBOX understands that moving can be expensive, as well as a time-consuming task. This is why SMARTBOX provides moving options at an affordable price, as well as time saving solutions that will help make your move less tiring and more enjoyable. Equally, we understand storage. We know that providing our customers with space saving solutions is important, and our goal is to offer great storage options that work for your specific needs.

SmartBox Portable Storage & Moving VS. SMARTBOX provides reliable service you can trust across the miles. We offer helpful storage options for each and every occasion. Are you moving across town? Relocating for work is convenient with SMARTBOX. WHAT OUR CUSTOMERS ARE SAYING "From the moment that I spoke to a customer service representative, I felt completely at ease. She asked the appropriate questions to determine my needs, gave me a quote, and then the box was delivered the very next day. This was the easiest and most professional transaction I have encountered in quite some time!" - Beth S., Richmond, VA Common Moving Mistakes You Need to Avoid › 5 Common Moving Injuries and How to Avoid Them › Tips for Storing Jewelry Effectively › Biddeford – 207-283-3621 Kennebunk – 207-985-4948 Sanford - 207-324-3350 Springvale - 207-324-3360 Cook and Cook Cabinetry Karen AlcornThis email address is being protected from spambots.

You need JavaScript enabled to view it.207-837-6432 207-433-0964This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Jeanne Rapone - certified kitchen designer John Bergeron - The Glass Guy This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Ponder's Hollow Custom Flooring and Millwork Gary Ryer - This email address is being protected from spambots. Old Port Tile Company Morningstar Stone and Tile Bob FerroThis email address is being protected from spambots. Tony Elliot - Snug Harbor Farm Rod Bineau - Mason Brian Fairfield - Artistic Stone mason This email address is being protected from spambots. Theodore and Theodore ArchitectsYou need JavaScript enabled to view it.207-420-0565You need JavaScript enabled to view it.207-282-2166You need JavaScript enabled to view it.207-318-3234 McIntosh and Tuttle Cabinetmakers Spang Builders, Inc. 10 Granite Heights Rd. Kennebunkport Maine, 04046

THE HISTORY of American men on screen is the history of repressed emotion. From Marlon Brando’s animalistic slow boil to Cary Grant’s Teflon-coated savoir-faire, movie icons have embodied the masculine inability to just say what they feel, for God’s sake. Recall, if you will, the Fonz, who was unable even to utter the words “wrong” or “sorry.”business for sale 64116 It is this rarified company to which Casey Affleck seeks admittance with his emotionally constipated performance in Manchester by the Sea. cost per hour for a handymanI’m being a little snarky, because it’s an impressive performance, especially coming from Casey Affleck. business for sale gingin waDamn it, there I go again. I like Casey, and it has to be tough trying to escape big brother Ben’s shadow.

But as a grieving (and grieving, and grieving) New England handyman who’s unexpectedly put in charge of his teenage nephew Patrick (Lucas Hedges), Affleck seems to be trying a bit too hard, straining towards a profundity that he can’t quite grasp. This is the third feature directed by playwright-turned-filmmaker Kenneth Lonergan, and with its downbeat tone and Serious Drama, it’s of a piece with his earlier efforts, You Can Count on Me and Margaret. (It’s like he’s trying to make up for the fact that his big Hollywood break was writing the screenplay for Analyze This.) In Manchester, Lee Chandler (Affleck) seems content to shovel walkways and unclog toilets for a living in Boston, until word comes that his older brother Joe (Kyle Chandler, seen in flashbacks) has died of a heart attack. Joe’s will stipulates that he wants Lee to move back to his titular hometown and become Patrick’s guardian. Lee, however, is haunted by past events and resists, with a toddler’s tenacity, every effort by the people around him to help him come to terms.

I feel for the guy, and you will too, but after two hours, I wanted to grab him by the collar and tell him to buck up. After all, he’s at least going to get an Oscar nomination out of it.Ask your tech how you can save with a Home Warranty – a single protection plan that covers multiple appliances and systems in your home, regardless of their age, brand, or where they were purchased.* Learn more about Sears Home WarrantySkip Maine state header navigation Carroll v. City of Portland Back to Opinions page MAINE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT Reporter of Decisions Decision: 1999 ME 131 Argued: June 7, 1999 Decided: August 16, 1999 Panel: WATHEN, C.J., and RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ. Majority: RUDMAN, DANA, ALEXANDER, and CALKINS, JJ.14 M.R.S.A. § 8111(1) (1980 & Supp. 1998) provides, in pertinent part: § 8111. that may have existed at common law, employees of governmental entities shall be absolutely immune from personal civil liability for the following:

. . . . C. Performing or failing to perform any discretionary function or duty, whether or not the discretion is abused; and whether or not any statute, charter, ordinance, order, resolution, rule or resolve under which the discretionary function or duty is performed is valid; . . . . The absolute immunity provided by paragraph C shall be applicable whenever a discretionary act is reasonably encompassed by the duties of the governmental employee in question, regardless of whether the exercise of the discretion is specifically authorized by statute, charter, ordinance, order, resolution, rule or resolve and shall be available to all governmental employees, including police officers and governmental employees involved in child welfare cases, who are required to exercise judgment or discretion in performing their official duties.Specifically, Giacomantonio's summary judgment motion stated: "The basis for the motion are [sic] that the Defendant[] [is] immune under the

Maine Tort Claims Act (MTCA) in that . . . the actions of . . . Giacomantonio were discretionary under the Maine Tort Claims Act."Although, under the MTCA, liability is the rule and immunity the exception for governmental employees, immunity is the rule and liability the exceptionSee 14 M.R.S.A. § 8103 (1980 & Supp.Adriance v. Town of Standish, 687 A.2d 238, 240 (Me. 1996). A sets forth specific exceptions to the broad immunity of governmental entities, subject to section 8104­p;B. See 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104­p;Notwithstanding the immunity waiver provisions of sectionB expressly retains certain types of immunity for governmental entities, including discretionary function immunity. 14 M.R.S.A. § 8104­p; immunity "preserve[s] independence of action without deterrence or intimidation by the fear of personal liability and vexatious suits." Grossman, 1999 ME 9, ¶ 6, 722 A.2d at 373 (quotations omitted). liability should not be imposed for conduct of a type for which the imposition

of liability would substantially impair the effective performance of a discretionary immunity serves the important purpose of separation of power by preventing the judicial branch from entertaining tort actions as tools for manipulating important policy decisions that have been committed to coordinate branchesAdriance, 687 A.2d at 240. the dilemma of policy intended to be resolved by the legislative or executive branches, the courts will refuse to review them in tort actions. . . .'" Id. at 240-41 (quoting W. Page Keeton et al., Prosser and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 131, at 1052 (5th ed. 1984)). the third factor, it is not enough for a challenged activity to simply involve evaluation, judgment, and expertise; the activity must also be based onSee Adriance, 687 A.2d at 241. function immunity 'does not include functions [that] involve any element of choice, judgment[,] or ability to make responsible decisions; every function would fall within the exception.'"