business for sale kilmarnock

6 bedroom hotel for sale Broomhill Hotel, London Road, Kilmarnock, Ayrshire, KA3 A large and impressive property in the centre of Kilmarnock, Ayrshire. Bar, restaurant, function room, 6 letting rooms large car park. May be suitable for development.For more information please contact Iain Sim or Gill Groom.Licensing, Permits and Other Forms Business License  Rates by Category – revised in 2013 Annual-business-license-2017 (Note: Due date for 2017 licenses will be May 1st) Special Event Permit Application Sequence of Approval of Large-Scale Development Projects Lodging Tax Registration Form Lodging Tax Monthly Report Meals Tax Registration Form Meals Tax Remittance Form Water & Wastewater Services Utilities Connection Permit (for initial piping connection) Utilities Account Application (to establish a water and sewer account) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Request Form Request for a Security Check by Kilmarnock Police Department
Town of Kilmarnock Employment Application Fee Schedule for permits, applications and licenses. © Official Town of Kilmarnock,VA website • All Rights Reserved • Site Design by VECTEC • disclaimers • privacy policies Commercial land and property Land and properties for sale and lease We have various land and properties for sale or lease. Please click on the links below to view more details.  You can arrange the properties by type or by town: Craigspout Cottage 131 Glasgow rd If you are interested in our land or properties, please complete an application form and return it to our Estates Management section. Details of where to send your application form are listed on the form. If you have any other queries you can telephone or e-mail us using the details below. Proposals for land use Land and property ownership enquiries Land and property ownership enquiries14 A Henderson Road 269 sq m / 2,898 sq ft 88 sq m / 947 sq ft
Luncarty Inn Marshall Way 184 sq m / 1,982 sq ft 17 sq m / 183 sq ft 61 North Methven Street 50 sq m / 540 sq ft 1-2 South St John`s Place 49 sq m / 530 sq ft For Sale / To Let 63 sq m / 673 sq ft 28 sq m / 302 sq ft 239 sq m / 2,571 sq ft Former Manuel Brickworks Haining Road 90-92 Spalding House, Queen Street, Broughty Ferry 12 sq m / 130 sq ft Corner Office (First Floor) 62 Academy Street 105 sq m / 1,126 sq ft 45a John Finnie Street 76 sq m / 822 sq ft 2,049 sq m / 22,060 sq ft 2 Warrender Park RoadThe median home value in Kilmarnock, VA is $204,300. the county median home value of $241,000. The national median home value is $177,414. The average price of homes sold in Kilmarnock, VA is $204,300. Approximately 48.64% of Kilmarnock homes are owned, compared to 34.04% rented, while Kilmarnock real estate listings include condos, townhomes, and single family homes for sale.
Commercial properties are also available. If you see a property you're interested in, contact a Kilmarnock real estate agent to arrange a tour today!business for sale lenasia Learn more about Kilmarnock Real Estate.business for sale mccormack 08 Jan, 2014 08:03:20 GMTcost per hour for a handyman This item will post to Singapore, but the seller hasn't specified postage options. Contact the seller- opens in a new window or tab and request a postage method to your location. Congo, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Republic of the Cote d Ivoire (Ivory Coast) Falkland Islands (Islas Malvinas) Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Turks and Caicos Islands Fri. 10 Feb. and Thu.
* You’ll see an estimated delivery date based on the seller’s dispatch time and delivery service. Delivery times may vary, especially during peak periods and will depend on when your payment clears - opens in a new window or tab. The seller won't accept returns for this item. Sellers may be required to accept returns for items that are not as described. Learn more about your rights as a buyer. - opens in a new window or tab By submitting your bid, you're committing to buy this item from the seller if you're the winning bidder. You've read and agree to the Global Shipping Programme terms and conditions - opens in a new window or tab. Import charges previously quoted are subject to change if you increase you maximum bid amount. By clicking Confirm, you're committing to buy this item from the seller if you're the winning bidder and have read and agree to the Global Shipping Programme terms and conditions - opens in a new window or tab. Import charges previously quoted are subject to change if you increase your maximum bid amount.
Resume bidding, if the page doesn't update immediately. By clicking 1 Click Bid, you are agreeing to buy this item from the seller if you're the winning bidder. Learn moreabout 1-click bid - opens in a new window or tabHOW TO PLACE AN AD Open between 8:00am – 5:00pm Email Us at NNN ClassifiedsSorry, the story you were looking for is no longer available. Explore other stories by clicking on one of the sections in the navigation bar above or check out any of the stories below. Live: Johnson under injury cloud Live: Warriors star Shaun Johnson is no certainty to play throughout the remainder of the NRL Auckland… The Ish Sodhi X-Factor Parker set for $2m payday against Fury Guptill ruled out of Chappell-Hadlee finale Lewis: Rugby rules create new issuesWish I could make money this easily – £6,000 in just an hour and a half. That’s what Paul O’Reilly, the boss of a controversial firm of business transfer agents called RTA, expects.
One of his reps visited Peter Ullmann, who owns a small printing business. Aged 73 and recovering from a heart bypass operation, Mr Ullmann was persuaded to let RTA put his business on the market. He says that the RTA rep assured him there would be “absolutely no costs”. There was another carrot used to entice Peter – he reckoned that £450,000 was roughly a fair price for his firm but RTA said it could sell for nearer £750,000. What’s more, RTA claimed to have potential buyers lined up. Only after signing the paperwork was Mr Ullmann, from Liphook in Hampshire, told that he needed to pay £6,000 up front to cover the cost of advertising. “I guess because of my vulnerable position and being pressurised I agreed to pay,” he said. His son Guy told me: “At the time I questioned why they had to do advertising if they had an interested party and was told that this was to get other parties involved so they could battle each other and increase the price. “On reflection I think this is a well-rehearsed response to this question.”
Peter was also concerned about the existence of the supposed potential buyers following a worrying question from the rep. “Just as he made to leave he asked if we could provide a list of publishing companies who could be possible purchasers so that they could approach them,” he said. Then, after the rep left, Peter noticed something not right with the paperwork. “I looked more closely at the invoice and there was no invoice number, which, as it involves VAT, is not HM Revenue and Customs acceptable.” Within an hour and a half he told RTA he wanted out and cancelled his cheque. RTA has responded by saying it will sue for the £6,000. As far as Paul O’Reilly of RTA is concerned, the issue is simple. “Mr Ullmann entered into an agreement with RTA,” he said. “It is Mr Ullmann that now wishes to renege on that agreement.” One question Mr O’Reilly wouldn’t answer is this: what work did RTA carry out in the 90 minutes before Mr Ullmann cancelled to deserve £6,000 from him?
I have previously written about RTA complaints and this, says Mr O’Reilly, amounts to a campaign against him. “Your campaign has achieved nothing other than to empower people to renege on legal and binding contracts to their cost and detriment. “This is a small minority because most of our clients, as successful business people, understand their obligations and commitments. “As such, you have done more harm than good in your futile efforts.” Paul O’Reilly of RTA is convinced that my stories about complaints concerning his firm encourage unhappy clients to take him on in futile legal fights. One person who doesn’t think it was futile to stand up to him is Udayan Gangadharan. He put his East London restaurant on the market through RTA after being assured that there would be no penalty fee when the six-month contract ended. He told a court that RTA assured him: “Within six months, if we do not sell the business you can do what you like.” But RTA didn’t sell the restaurant in six months.
In fact, it didn’t make any contact with Mr Gangadharan for SIX YEARS. That was when it discovered that Mr Gangadharan had found a buyer himself, to which the firm responded by suing him for £5,000 for alleged breach of contract. Law firm Debenhams Ottoway defended Mr Gangadharan, telling the court there had been a “wholesale failure” by RTA to honour its part of the deal or show what efforts, if any, it had made to sell the restaurant. Chucking out RTA’s claim, District Judge Reeves described its conduct as “reprehensible” and ordered it to pay some of Mr Gangadharan’s legal costs. His lawyer, Luke Tucker Harrison, said: “It appears from widespread reports on the internet and from the Daily Mirror that this is not an isolated incident. It shows that despite the aggressive tactics of RTA it is worth standing up for your rights.” Paul O’Reilly responded: “The matter was debated in court and the court agreed with Mr Gangadharan, so what?” So Mr O’Reilly, it’s not futile to fight unjustifiable demands by your company.
Fighting a case against RTA can be a legal lottery and among the losers is Nick Griggs, who let one of its reps visit his motorbike store in Brixham, Devon. When it was valued at £55,000 and hearing that RTA had “purchasers waiting to view” he agreed to let the firm market it. When no supposed purchasers came viewing, Mr Griggs stopped his instalment payments. RTA told him he’d signed a contract, couldn’t back out and so sued him, though Mr Griggs suggested a compromise. This was to let RTA continue marketing his business and take its fee as commission from any sale. “If they are confident that the valuation they have made is realistic they should not have any problem finding a buyer,” he told the court. “But I have yet to receive any phone calls from any interested parties and very much doubt if I ever will.” The crux of his argument was: “The contract was sold to me on the basis of misleading information and the promise of buyers waiting to view.” However the judge ruled that Mr Griggs could not legally quit the deal.
Paul O’Reilly of RTA was naturally delighted. “The client admits to agreeing to pay money,” he said. “The client admits the money was not paid and in the meantime we were spending money on advertising and marketing.” The client also claims that he was misled into signing the contract, but Mr O’Reilly did not comment on this. RTA isn’t the only controversial operator in this industry that's notching up complaints. Phoenix Business Agents claim “we are able to sell most types of business”, but it couldn’t sell Mark Salkind’s barbers in Bexhill-on-Sea, East Sussex. Yet it is still demanding £4,390 – that’s £3,000 plus VAT and debt collectors’ fees. “I was cold-called and told there was a market for my type of business,” said Mr Salkind, “but now they say there isn’t.” I tried to contact Phoenix director Zulfikar Hamid, resulting in a furious response from PR firm Alder Media for daring to visit his Oxford home. Mr Hamid, there’s a simple solution: put your real office address on your website rather than a virtual office.
The firm’s spokesman said there had been extensive marketing of Mr Salkind’s business but wouldn’t give me details of supposed interested parties, citing the Data Protection Act. He also insisted that the contract was clear, though that’s debatable. The fee is written as “three thousand pounds” which is harder to spot than “£3,000” and to understand the implications you have to cross-reference a clause at the bottom of the contract with another at the top. I showed the contract to solicitor Luke Tucker Harrison, who described one clause as sharp practice. “It seeks to make the person who signs the document personally liable as a guarantor for the fees of Phoenix,” he said. “In light of case law that clause would not be enforceable in my view.” Victims of rogues in this industry have formed the Campaign for Ethics for Business Transfer Agents. CEBTA says it is hearing as many as 10 new victims a week. “They are not as might be expected the innocent, naïve or careless who do not read agreements properly, which would not be acceptable in itself,” said one of its volunteers.